Florian La Roche (laroche(a)redhat.com) said:
> The issue here is that it's not *that* simple, once you
> start handling all the devices that aren't in sysfs. Moreover,
> it breaks the 'load module on device access' model.
I thought this is more the exception and such devices should go into
a list of always available devices.
It's not really the exception; it's the impetus behind kmod and
module aliases in general.
Bill