On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 18:08 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 07/10/2013 02:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> No. The release blocking desktops are KDE and GNOME. This is stated in
> the preamble of all release criteria pages, for lack of anywhere better
> to state it.
If we were only proposing headless ARM servers for primary how would
these criteria apply? The changes to the build system would be the same
with our without these desktops in either case. Note I'm not asking
Adam specifically; it's a question for the room.
As I said elsewhere in the thread, the criteria should be subsidiary to
the primary arch designation. If we decide we want to take ARM as a
primary arch in any form in which the current release criteria don't
apply, we should amend the release criteria.
In context I was just providing some background information: as the
criteria currently stand, KDE and GNOME are the release blocking
desktops. (Technically that in itself isn't really an aspect of the
release criteria; it's Fedora status quo that predates the current form
of the release validation process).
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net