On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> wrote:
On 12/07/2016 04:29 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> -1 at least for the moment. b
Is this due to sugar? Would you accept patches?
One of the reasons, and of course, I think if we want to actively
retire packages we need to enage with the owners of the dependencies.