On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Matej Stuchlik <mstuchli(a)redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
When it comes to python3, one way to shave off ~9MiB from python3-libs, and
possibly quite a bit more overall, would be to not install both optimized and
unoptimized bytecode, as we do now, but just the unoptimized one (the performance
hit should be very small).
How small is "very small" ? Have you measured it?
I don't think 9MB of disk space is worth taking a performance hit for ...