On Friday, 11 March 2022 17.43.01 WET Miroslav Suchý wrote:

> Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and

> try to run:

>

> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules

> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again

> sudo dnf module reset '*'

>

> dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \

> --enablerepo=updates-testing \

> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo

> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync

>

>

> This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal

> potential problems.

>

> You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.

>

>

> The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual

> upgrade.

>

>

> In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate

> package.

>

> Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in

> Fedora 36. Please check existing reports against

>

> fedora-obsolete-packages first:

>

> https://red.ht/2kuBDPu

>

> and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F36FailsToInstall)

> reports:

>

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1992487&bug_id_type=anddependso

> n&format=tvp&list_id=12486533

>

> Thank you

>

> Miroslav


This is what I get:


Error:  
Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - problem with installed package julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64
 - mbedtls-2.16.12-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 - julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository

--

José Abílio