-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 06/22/2011 04:57 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
I'm curious to know the use case(s) for this technology.
Does it enable certain types of behaviour that aren't possible currently?
Would it enable a system running Fedora to interact with other systems
with a greater guarantee about its behaviour or function?
Is it just something that system integrators would see as a feature
enabling them to make a secured system (ie something useful for RHEL)?
If it just allows you to optionally run a signed kernel, I don't
understand the point if it can be circumvented by choosing to run an
unsigned one. So I think there must be some benefit that isn't
obvious. What's the benefit?
The idea is to allow certain tools/machines to make judgments on how
"trusted" a machine is. For example you could set up a VPN server that
says I will only allow a machine that passes the "Trusted" test to join
my network. Another potential example would be to not allow a guest
machine to run on your host if its OS is not "Trusted" Or to have a
guest OS check to see if the Host Server is Trusted or stop running.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----