On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:26:58PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Garrett
> The expectation would be that the architecture maintainers have fixed
> everything before moving to being a primary architecture, so this should
> only be an issue if maintainers or upstream manage to come up with new
> breakage. But yes, it forces people to care about something they might
> previously have ignored, so I guess that's an advantage.
And we've already being doing that with the vast majority of issues
already fixed and committed to mainline.
Agreed. I just mean that it's not a terribly significant benefit to
becoming a primary architecture.
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org