On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:15:57PM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On 11/12/06, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>Okay its come to my attention that the readahead configs have a
>difficult time being kept in sync as package updates roll out. For fc6
>right now for example readahead is out of sync with firefox libraries.
>
>Can we update readahead's implementation so we can get per package
>control of the default configs? Is a readahead.d/ structure
>appropriate here?
Sorry... i didnt look hard enough... the readahead.d structure was
added for fc6.... the problem is package maintainers aren't using it
yet. I guess what I need to do is parse the existing config file...
identify individual packages that could drop files in readahead.d/
and poke the appropriate maintainers in the eye about dropping a file
in there as part of package payloading.
Anyone want to help me construct the list of packages that could make
sure of readahead.d/ on a per package basis based on the default
readahead configs we have right now?
Update: I've wrote a small and simple readahead-auditd that is able
to collect all filenames from boot process. It means everyone will be
able to generate unique list for his Fedora. And also I can maintain
default lists more effective now. I'm going to release an
experimental readahead package with this solution to FC7 next week.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak(a)redhat.com>