On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> No, the intent was very much to change what the resulting desktop
> prioritizes. Quite a few FESCo members would be rather disappointed
> if the new Workstation ended up just an unchanged GNOME[1].
[snip]
> [1] As opposed to any of 1) non-GNOME, 2) GNOME changed by Fedora, 3)
> GNOME upstream changing. I don't know enough to say whether any of
> these variants is generally preferred within FESCo.
2 features which would have changed that have been proposed over time:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KDE_Plasma_Desktop_by_default
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cinnamon_as_Default_Desktop
Both have been rejected by FESCo.
Repeating myself, "I don't know enough to say whether any of these
variants is generally preferred within FESCo.".
Looking back at these two proposals in particular, they have one thing
in common - they haven't been even supported by maintainers of the
respective desktops. That made both proposals pretty much impossible
to vote for.
Mirek