Sorry, upon closer review doesn't look like that quite matches.  Couldn't find a bug... if someone knows of one, please let me know, otherwise I'll create one.  I used the workaround, and that worked fine btw; but doesn't seem like it should be the solution.


On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Gerald B. Cox <> wrote:
I found the bug:

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Gerald B. Cox <> wrote:

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:44 PM, gil <> wrote:
a fix for this problem is:
# rpmbuild < 4.6 support
%if ! 0%{?__isa_bits}
%ifarch x86_64 ia64 ppc64 sparc64 s390x alpha ppc64le aarch64
%global __isa_bits 64
%global __isa_bits 32

I've just run into this problem with the sphinx build - which built fine with 2.2.7-1 on January 21st - which was before this thread started. Is the workaround the recommendation?  Was a mock bug created?