Since Fedora is also making the change, I'm wondering whether this voice should also
be heard.  They're assuming it's just GLib.

Carol

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:09 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:50:18AM -0400, Carol Bouchard wrote:
> Hi Daniel and other Fedora experts:
>
> I'm trying to get the m4 package to change their code.  They're saying this
> is not POSIX
> compliant change so they are resisting.  See below snippet.  I don't have
> the
> background to this change to answer their questions. Is someone with this
> background willing to jump onto the email thread to move forward with this?
> Let me know and I'll add you to the thread.  Also I told them it's not a
> glib
> change only that Fedora is also moving in this direction but my comments
> got lost in the thread.

Looking at this thread:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-m4/2021-03/msg00000.html

it appears that all the right people I'd expect are already involved
in the discussion from the GLibC / Gnulib side.

Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|