On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The only Freedom you've lost is that now, in addition to the person-hours to
do the work and monetary cost to host your bits or generate physical media,
you have an additional cost if you wish to have your own cert that will be
accepted out of the box by the next generation of PC hardware. You have as
much equal footing as Fedora does to plunk down the $99 and play along in
the PC sandbox. That's a better deal than Fedora's gpg signing setup.
Hmm, will the package maintainers have the freedom to not support
users who have the secureboot enabled? How are we going to detect
this?
Thanks,
Orcan