On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 07/27/2012 11:29 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
> I'd agree, but git hashes don't do in sortable order. I mean, they
> do, but only Discordian sort.
I'm not suggesting you have rpm sort on git hashes. The release string is
required to have a numeric prefix before the date and/or git hash. I'm
talking about removing the date part of it so that you still have a numeric
prefix (e.g. 0.5) before the git hash. Ordering happens on the 0.X part,
not on the git hash.
OIC. Right. It's Friday.
Worth considering.
-J
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie