Josh Boyer schrieb:
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 14:04 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 13:26 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> Not sure what sub-titles I'd choose. Something that indicates the
>>> essential information about 'core' vs 'extra', I suppose.
>>> Anyone got any ideas?
>> Fedora Repo N -> repository with all the packages
>> Fedora Linux N -> the Linux Distribution that was known as Prime
> Hm, I don't think 'Linux' really conveys the information that these are
> the _core_ packages on the install media, rather than the extra stuff
> you might install later from the network (or extra DVDs or whatever).
> I suppose 'Repo' is a little more suited to its task, but the core stuff
> is still in a repository on the install media (and elsewhere) too, so
> that name isn't ideal either.
>
> We really want some names which convey the distinction between the Core
> stuff and the Extra bits.
As jwb wrote: each spin has a different "core" set... And, btw, Users
IMHO should not care where the packages come from.
Got any better ideas?
No. Well, maybe something else shows up.
No, we don't. The Core stuff and Extra bits are intermingled
between
spins. It varies. And there's the Everything spin.
Naming sucks.
Agreed -- but referencing three things (Repo as a whole, the Distro that
gets made from the Repo and the Project itself) under the name "Fedora"
sucks even more IMHO and just creates confusion ;-)
Cu
thl