On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 10:09 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> writes:
> It is also in bugzilla, just not in
> but in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732857
> which has been marked as duplicate of that.
There should have been a comment pointing out this important information
by the person who added the duplicate.
You seem to want everything handed to you on a plate. To me, it doesn't
seem unreasonable to expect a maintainer of a key distro component -
moreover, one who's being *paid* to do that job - to do just a bit of
research on a bug. It took me all of about fifteen minutes to find all
the reports and info so far discussed, and I'm _not_ being paid to
You say that I should have posted some things to the bug report and not
a mailing list thread...yet you seem to respond to devel list threads
rather more frequently than you respond to bug reports. I note that you
_still_ haven't actually responded to this bug report: to anyone not
following this thread it still looks like the bug has been entirely
neglected for nearly a month. In contrast, you replied to my devel list
thread within a day.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora