On Monday, 17 October 2022 08.28.11 WEST Jaroslav Mracek wrote:

> Thank you for pointing this. Why DNF5 is not named as DNF and why we do not

> plan to name it as DNF? DNF5 is a completely new product.


That is where the irony is, it is a new product but you still keep the moniker DNF in the name (even if just for now). It is a contradictory message. :-)


The funny part, at least for me, is the 5 in the name, that reminds me of rpm5. It seems that for package related issues 5 is a cursed number. :-)


Regards,

--

José Abílio Matos