On Wed, 21 May 2008 21:28:21 -0300
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On May 21, 2008, Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, then I'll call it an alternate kernel package. Which we still
> aren't going to allow.
> However doing that with an alternative kernel
> package isn't something that sits well.
> I'm talking about having any alternate kernel, period.
I have never opposed the idea of replacing the non-Free kernel Fedora
ships today with linux-libre or any of its predecessors. I just
thought proposing it as an alternative that I offered to maintain
myself would generate less heat. Maybe I was mistaken.
I didn't say you were going to outright replace it. But having more
than one kernel package will not be allowed. It has been discussed in
the past for things not even related to kernel-libre.
josh