On Qui, 2016-11-17 at 21:04 +0100, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 11/17/2016 09:01 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> On 17/11/16 10:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Hi, folks!
> >
> > While looking into an issue with how GNOME Software decides which
> > release to offer an upgrade to when there's more than one
> > plausible
> > candidate, I noticed something interesting: we do not actually
> > have a
> > policy on what we 'recommend' people to do in this case.
> >
> > You'll notice we don't explicitly specify *how* you should do
> > this.
> > That is, if you're currently running Fedora 23, and you want to
> > upgrade to Fedora 25 next week, are you supposed to:
> >
> > i) Upgrade to Fedora 24 first, then from Fedora 24 to Fedora 25
> > ii) Upgrade directly to Fedora 25
> >
> Why not using a similar scheme from Libre Office [1] where Fedora
> 25 is
> the more recent version while Fedora 24 is more stable?
Why consider F24 more stable? Both releases are stable @same level in
general.
Because F24 is indeed more stable ?
Luya, IMO, give a good point, user may want move to F24 (because is
more stable than F25) , so if we can't have choice in Gnome Software,
maybe I change my opinion, to the next one ( just because is more
stable )
Cheers,
--
Sérgio M. B.