On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 12:44 +0100, David Nielsen wrote:
Solution, fix gconf rather than complain over davidz and friends at
least suggesting a forward minded solution to the horror that is "human
readable" configuration files.
I've been reading this whole thread and I'm tired of a couple of
semantics being used:
1. the assumption that all new development is 'progressive' or
'visionary'. Forward motion isn't always positive. So let's cut the spin
and just call it what it is - a new interface.
2. That anyone promoting sticking with the status-quo is somehow
backward.
cut it out.
-sv