Denis Leroy (denis(a)poolshark.org) said:
>Editing pam configs in package scriptlets strikes me as a really
bad
>idea... it's not something that's ever been done and so a lot of people
>are going to get very surprised by it. Especially if they've customized
>their configs at all. And doing it once is going to set the precedent
>for it to be done more...
I tend to agree, but what's the alternative ?
Add support in authconfig, set it up by default but require existing
users to run authconfig once?
Bill