On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 07:38:29AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
So what process should I use? Pull Requests or just removing
obsolete
stuff? I'm ready to do either way. Should I leave this to FESCo?
The choice of implementation details is yours. You can always ask
FESCo for opinion, but I don't think you'll get one that is much more
definitive than the discussion here on the list.
Zbyszek
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 8:00 PM Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu>
wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> "KL" == Kalev Lember
<kalevlember(a)gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > KL> I agree with Zbyszek, I think it would be best to push the changes
> > KL> directly to git.
> >
> > But then we're back to the same problem: Do you remove the ldconfig
> > calls entirely or do you add the macros? Prepare for flames if you get
> > it wrong, even though it's nontrivial to get it right and reverting is
> > far quicker than flaming. Then again, getting people more used to the
> > idea that automated process are going to be making changes to packages
> > is a good thing.
> >
> > All of this reminds me that it's well past time to move forward with the
> > mass Group: removal. At least that one is a trivial change.