On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:25:43AM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 07/11/2013 08:34 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>That's why I'd like to see all of these things fixed *before* promotion.
Yes, you've been very consistent, it can be summarized in 3 points:
1. Provide a list of every ARM deficiency.
Every known deficiency, sure.
2. Provide a fix for everything listed in 1.
Either a fix or an explanation of why it's not worth fixing.
3. After #1 and #2 are complete, we can talk about what else is
From a technical standpoint, I think that would be entirely adequate.
The rest is just ensuring that rel-eng, qa and so on are happy, which is
something that can be done entirely in parallel with development.
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org