On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
<paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2015-07-27 22:34 GMT-03:00 Dan Callaghan
<dcallagh(a)redhat.com>:
> Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05
+10:00:
>> Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
>
> Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on
> every arch (which sounds like fighting a losing battle), could you just
> build the doc subpackage on only one arch?
>
> %ifarch x86_64
> %package doc
> BuildArch: noarch
> ...
> %endif
This looks like a very wise way of handling it. Actually, while debugging
It's not, it breaks all secondary architectures.
it, I found that the translated documentation was not being properly
generated, and after fixing it, it would take like 3 to 4 times longer
to generate docs, and doc generation was already almost 80% of
the package build time...
That tells me the process of generating docs is broken, or they're
very good docs and worth the wait!
> I think Koji still counts this a regular noarch subpackage and it
should
> therefore be included in the Fedora trees for all arches.
In the worst case, it would generate -doc packages only for x86_64,
where most users interested on reading it would be using.
And won't generate docs for any of the secondary arches which don't
have any x86_64 build capacity, please don't do this.