On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:06:45PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
But we can't innovate at all without trying new things at some
point.
That point ought to be based on something solid like the acceptance
criteria Bill's already writing up. Then FESCo can have more
confidence in making a decision about it. I'd rather concentrate on
that constructive effort than epidemiologically questionable
generalizations.
Fair enough. I'll back off of those. It's a discussion for a different list,
anyway.
--
Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences