Seems like bitbucket uses unversioned tar ball, not the best approch
https://bitbucket.org/yarosla/httpress/get/tip.tar.gz
I would make my own tarball from the git checkout and document in the spec how to make it
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control

Tim


On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
 I've submitted a while ago a review-request on a package [0] that is
taken from bitbucket.org. Unfortunately there was no reviewer yet, and I
suspect that is because unlike github [1] we have no rules on how to
handle bitbucket. Have other packagers experienced something similar in
other software? Is there a "good" way to handle repository-distributed
software? As it is now in [0] I've tried to simulate the github rules on
bitbucket.

regards,
Nikos


[0]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282
[1]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct