On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:01 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 7/7/10 5:43 AM, James Laska wrote:
> If there is a solution that addresses the problems identified during
> F-13, and it can be implemented in *short* time. It would be
> compelling. I'm a fan of solving problems with tooling, but I'm not
> convinced that is where our big investment should be for the upcoming
> release, or that it fully addresses the problems encountered during
> F-13.
I can think of one quick and simple way of doing this.
When we review a bug and accept it on the blocker list, we use a keyword
of "ACCEPTED" or some such. That way any bug without the word is
assumed to just be proposed and not yet accepted. A bit more manual
work and a bit harder to query, but it still nets the result of
differentiating between bugs that are proposed and bugs that are
accepted blockers.
Thoughts?
keywords we have to ask to be added to the system, I'm not keen on doing
that as a temp hack. Whiteboard space is freeform, though. We could just
pick a word to use in the whiteboard space - AcceptedBlocker, for e.g. -
and go with that.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net