On 01/25/2013 12:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 23:03 +0000, "Jóhann B.
Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> It's best to rip the bandage of this in one
release.
>
>> The churn from this should have been more or less
covered when we
>> implement biosdevname so the fallout from this change should be minimal
>> if any...
> I see the 's' word in
there ;)
> That's always the hope, and then we meet the cold
reality, where someone
> just patched 'em1' into everything and hoped that was good enough. But
> sure, 'damn the torpedoes' is a viable approach too. I guess I was just
> kind of hoping F19 would be a release without yet more churn in the core
> system where we could try and stabilize things a bit.
I agree. The scope says no impact, but who knows how many
packages depend
on hardcoded names.