> Send fedora-devel-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com >
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
to > fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com > > You can reach the person managing the list
at > fedora-devel-list-owner@redhat.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so
it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-devel-list
digest..." > > > Today's Topics: >
> 1. ctrl-c during boot != good (Dax
Kelson) > 2. Re: ctrl-c during boot != good (Bill
Nottingham) > 3. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Richard
Hughes) > 4. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Pete
Graner) > 5. Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date (Ian
Burrell) > 6. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Clyde E.
Kunkel) > 7. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Chris
Adams) > 8. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Clyde E.
Kunkel) > 9. undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled'
(Orion Poplawski) > 10. Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date
(Thomas M Steenholdt) > 11. Re: rawhide report: 20060922 changes
(Mike Chambers) > 12. Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems. (Bojan
Smojver) > 13. Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? (Peter
Gordon) > 14. Re: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? (Mark
Rosenstand) > 15. Re: ctrl-c during boot != good (Gilboa
Davara) > 16. Core x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status
2006-09-23 > (Matt Domsch) > 17.
Core i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 (Matt Domsch) >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------- >
> Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:32:40 -0600 > From:
Dax Kelson <dax@gurulabs.com> > Subject:
ctrl-c during boot != good > To: notting@redhat.com > Cc:
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <1158946360.18703.24.camel@mentorng.gurulabs.com> > Content-Type: text/plain > >
SysVinit-2.86-12 > ---------------- > * Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill
Nottingham <notting@redhat.com> -
2.86-12 > - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed
to hung > services (#184340) > > I don't have the
permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting > this
wrong. > > You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c
during boot up. > Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of
daemons or commands > (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious
security breach. This > is also a disaster for a kiosk where random
malicious joe blows can > screwup and stop the boot. > > I
filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during > bootup"
problem. Lets not go backwards. > > Dax Kelson > Guru
Labs > > > > ------------------------------ >
> Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:49:41 -0400 > From:
Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com> >
Subject: Re: ctrl-c during boot != good > To: Dax Kelson <dax@gurulabs.com> > Cc:
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <20060922174941.GA17495@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> > Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii > > Dax Kelson (dax@gurulabs.com) said: >>
SysVinit-2.86-12 >> ---------------- >> * Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill
Nottingham <notting@redhat.com> -
2.86-12 >> - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be
passed to hung >> services (#184340) >>
>> I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be
interpreting >> this wrong. >> >> You do *not* want
users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up. >> Otherwise they can
completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands >> (like remounting
/ rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This >> is also a
disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can >> screwup
and stop the boot. >> >> I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix
the "can press control-c during >> bootup" problem. Lets not go
backwards. > > We have multiple requests from people who want to be
able to press > ctrl-c to stop hanging daemons. Note that you can
*already* interrupt > rc.sysinit. > > Bill > >
> > ------------------------------ > > Message:
3 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:52:14 +0100 > From: Richard Hughes
<hughsient@gmail.com> >
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes > To: Development
discussions related to Fedora Core > <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com> > Cc: fedora-test-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <1158947534.26902.1.camel@hughsie-laptop.localdomain> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Thu,
2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys@redhat.com
wrote: >> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6 >>
--------------------- >> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson
<alexl@redhat.com> -
0.8.1-1.fc6 >> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not
be closed >> >> hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >>
----------------------- >> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >> - Apply patch correcting tmp file usage >
> Anyone else getting this: > > (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp
100% |=========================| 1.6 MB > 00:09
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum > Trying
other mirror. > (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100%
|=========================| 42 kB > 00:00
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum > >
I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum >
clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail. > > Known
issue? Thanks. > > Richard. > > > >
> ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 >
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:50:14 -0400 > From: Pete Graner <pgraner@redhat.com> >
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes > To: richard@hughsie.com, Development
discussions related to Fedora > Core <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com> > Cc: fedora-test-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <45143066.2060205@redhat.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed > > Richard Hughes wrote: >> On Thu,
2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys@redhat.com
wrote: >>> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6 >>>
--------------------- >>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson
<alexl@redhat.com> -
0.8.1-1.fc6 >>> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to
not be closed >>> >>>
hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >>> ----------------------- >>>
* Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >>> - Apply patch correcting tmp file
usage >> >> Anyone else getting this: >>
>> (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6
MB >> 00:09 >> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum >>
Trying other mirror. >> (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100%
|=========================| 42 kB >>
00:00 >> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum >>
>> I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried
"yum >> clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no
avail. >> >> Known issue? Thanks. >> >>
Richard. >> >> > > Same here. Started last
night. > > Pete > -- > Pete
Graner
email: <pgraner@redhat.com> >
> > > ------------------------------ > >
Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:38:44 -0700 > From: "Ian
Burrell" <ianburrell@gmail.com> >
Subject: Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date > To: "Development
discussions related to Fedora Core" > <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: > <d91f09cd0609221238x36beaa28yb184b6ebb8a9a646@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
format=flowed > > On 9/22/06, Thomas M Steenholdt <tmus@tmus.dk> wrote: >> >> It would be really nice if
there were some good, universal and simple >> way to see how updated a
site mirror is. >> >> One approach that I find to be working
well is what debian is suggesting >> for their mirrors ( http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror
). Not only >> does this "trace method" provide info on when the mirror
was last >> sync'ed, it also shows the "route" of the mirroring, i.e.
what mirror >> this mirror mirrors from (confusing yet true
:o)). >> >> Although this does not sort the actual problem of
the stale mirrors, it >> will give people an easy way to monitor their
own (local?) mirrors and >> perhaps even allow people to select a few
often-updated near-by mirrors, >> instead of getting packages from a
stale mirror across the ocean. >> > > It is fairly simple
to compare the timestamps in the repomd.xml files. > If the
timestamps are older than the master, then the mirror is >
out-of-date. This doesn't help with mirrors which are in the
middle > of syncing or had a failure. Mirrors could use the
rsync > --delay-updates option to make the updates more atomic. >
> - Ian > > > >
------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 22
Sep 2006 15:46:02 -0400 > From: "Clyde E. Kunkel" <clydekunkel7734@cox.net> >
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes > To: richard@hughsie.com, Development
discussions related to Fedora > Core <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com> > Cc: fedora-test-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <45143D7A.8000008@cox.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed > > Richard Hughes wrote: >> On Thu,
2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys@redhat.com
wrote: >>> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6 >>>
--------------------- >>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson
<alexl@redhat.com> -
0.8.1-1.fc6 >>> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to
not be closed >>> >>>
hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >>> ----------------------- >>>
* Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >>> - Apply patch correcting tmp file
usage >> >> Anyone else getting this: >>
>> (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6
MB >> 00:09 >> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum >>
Trying other mirror. >> (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100%
|=========================| 42 kB >>
00:00 >> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum >>
>> I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried
"yum >> clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no
avail. >> >> Known issue? Thanks. >> >>
Richard. >> >> > > Some kind of problem between
usually reliable mirrors and > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/ > > I used a method seen on one of these lists in
the last couple of days: > > # rpm -Uvh > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm > > then, yum update. > > WFM. >
> -- > Regards, > > Old Fart > (my reply-to
address is "munged" to defeat spambots) > > > >
------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 22
Sep 2006 14:53:09 -0500 > From: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net> >
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes > To: Development
discussions related to Fedora Core > <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>,
fedora-test-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <20060922195309.GD657887@hiwaay.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >
Once upon a time, Clyde E. Kunkel <clydekunkel7734@cox.net>
said: >> Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/ >> >> I used a method seen on one of these
lists in the last couple of days: >> >> # rpm -Uvh
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm >> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm > > It appears to be a problem on the mirror
master. I just verified my > mirror is synced and up to the minute
(including re-downloading those > two files), and I still get the same
error. > -- > Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net> > Systems
and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services > I don't speak for
anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. > > > >
------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 22
Sep 2006 16:54:42 -0400 > From: "Clyde E. Kunkel" <clydekunkel7734@cox.net> >
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes > To: Chris Adams
<cmadams@hiwaay.net>, Development
discussions related > to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>, > fedora-test-list@redhat.com > Message-ID: <45144D92.8020903@cox.net> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >
Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Clyde E. Kunkel <clydekunkel7734@cox.net>
said: >>> Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and
>>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/ >>> >>> I used a method seen on one of
these lists in the last couple of days: >>> >>> # rpm
-Uvh >>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm >>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm >> >> It appears to be a problem on the mirror
master. I just verified my >> mirror is synced and up to the
minute (including re-downloading those >> two files), and I still get
the same error. > > Same here...so, > > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/ > > is not the mirror master? > >
> -- > Regards, > > Old Fart > (my reply-to
address is "munged" to defeat spambots) > > > >
------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Fri, 22
Sep 2006 15:09:07 -0600 > From: Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com> >
Subject: undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled' > To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <ef1jdp$fqd$1@sea.gmane.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed > > Just trying to build paraview against
libOSMesa.so now that it's made > its return and am getting the following
link errors: > > /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to
`is_selinux_enabled' > /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to
> `security_get_boolean_active' > /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so:
undefined reference to > `security_get_boolean_pending' > >
This is against today's rawhide (mesa-libOSMesa-devel-6.5.1-3.fc6). >
Need to explicitly link against -lselinux these days? Should libOSMesa
> be linked against libselinux? > >
/usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so.6.5.1: >
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6
(0x00002aaaaaf53000) >
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0
(0x00002aaaab1d6000) >
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6
(0x00002aaaab3f0000) >
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000) > > >
> -- > Orion Poplawski > System
Administrator
303-415-9701 x222 > NWRA/CoRA
Division
FAX: 303-415-9702 > 3380 Mitchell
Lane
orion@cora.nwra.com > Boulder,
CO
80301
http://www.cora.nwra.com >
> > > ------------------------------ > >
Message: 10 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:18:14 +0200 > From: Thomas M
Steenholdt <tmus@tmus.dk> > Subject: Re:
Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date > To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <ef1jum$hn7$1@sea.gmane.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
format=flowed > > Ian Burrell wrote: >> >> It is
fairly simple to compare the timestamps in the repomd.xml files. >> If
the timestamps are older than the master, then the mirror is >>
out-of-date. This doesn't help with mirrors which are in the
middle >> of syncing or had a failure. Mirrors could use the
rsync >> --delay-updates option to make the updates more
atomic. >> > > This does not provide the mirroring trace
(which I think would be very > nice), it also says nothing about whether
or not the rest of the files > have been mirrored or only the repomd.xml
file. > > /Thomas > > > >
------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Fri,
22 Sep 2006 16:37:39 -0500 > From: Mike Chambers <mike@miketc.com> > Subject:
Re: rawhide report: 20060922 changes > To: Development discussions related
to Fedora Core > <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com> > Cc: fedora-test-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <1158961059.2552.1.camel@scrappy.miketc.com> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2006-09-22
at 07:39 -0400, buildsys@redhat.com wrote: >
>> Updated Packages: > >>
evolution-data-server-1.8.0-9.fc6 >>
--------------------------------- >> * Thu Sep 21 2006 Matthew Barnes
<mbarnes@redhat.com> -
1.8.0-9.fc6 >> - Revise patch for RH bug #198935 (fix a crash reported
in bug #207446). > > Evo-2.8.0-6 wasn't included in today's
build? Guess tomorrow's or on a > people.redhat.com site until
then? > > -- > Mike Chambers > Madisonville,
KY > > "Sex is like air, it's not important unless your not getting
any!" > > > > ------------------------------ >
> Message: 12 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:53:04 +0000 (UTC) >
From: Bojan Smojver <bojan@rexursive.com> > Subject: Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems. > To:
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <loom.20060922T234458-491@post.gmane.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >
Naoki <naoki <at> valuecommerce.com> writes: > >>
Ahh, indeed the RH repo is fine : >> >> # rpm -Uvh >
> Actually, it still isn't. You can force all kinds of things by using
RPM > directly. Yum, however, will check packages checksum against what it
has in its > primary.xml.gz file. For example, here are 3 packages from
i386 repository: > > ------------------------------------- >
1a9e25cd7c81e1ce10e2b73dc47a35eed166a698
gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm >
2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761
hal-0.5.7.1-3.fc6.i386.rpm >
a7b7fd448a2960c355c039297b070fece73f7521
hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm >
------------------------------------- > > However, primary.xml.gz
has: > > ------------------------------------- >
<name>gsf-sharp</name> >
<arch>i386</arch> > <version epoch="0" ver="0.8.1"
rel="1.fc6"/> > <checksum
type="sha" >
pkgid="YES">ffadfbeab23ac7ef2d252ae68930ca4283435129</checksum> >
> <name>hal</name> >
<arch>i386</arch> > <version epoch="0" ver="0.5.7.1"
rel="3.fc6"/> > <checksum
type="sha" >
pkgid="YES">2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761</checksum> >
> <name>hsqldb</name> >
<arch>i386</arch> > <version epoch="1" ver="1.8.0.4"
rel="3jpp.2"/> > <checksum
type="sha" >
pkgid="YES">e1131397f0919ff1d04c16b5fcb7be6b82891748</checksum> >
------------------------------------- > > Two of those three don't
match the checksum and yum won't update them. Here are > the
errors: > > ------------------------------------- > (5/38):
hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3j 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB
00:10 > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm: > [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum >
Trying other mirror. > (16/38): gsf-sharp-0.8.1- 100%
|=========================| 42 kB
00:00 > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm: > [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum >
Trying other mirror. > ------------------------------------- >
> -- > Bojan > > > >
------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Fri,
22 Sep 2006 21:10:35 -0700 > From: Peter Gordon <peter@thecodergeek.com> >
Subject: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? > To: Development discussions
related to Fedora Core > <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <4514B3BB.8070801@thecodergeek.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >
Hello, all. > > I've not as of yet been able to get Compiz and
AIGLX eye-candy working (odd > since it was working nicely around the
FC6T2 time frame). Because of this, AIGLX > doesn't seem very useful to
me, and as I've been having some issues with a few > SDL/OpenGL apps, I'd
like to disable it to test if it is AIGLX or something else > that is
malfunctioning. > > I looked through the radeon(4) and xorg.conf(5)
man pages with Yelp and found > nothing useful. A google search returned
an earlier post from the X.org mailing > list from Donnie Berkholz
suggesting to add `Option "AIGLX" "off"` in the > ServerFlags section of
the xorg.conf file. Unfortunately, that just results in > a hardlock when
between when RHGB finishes and when GDM attempts to start up. > >
Any suggestions would be most appreciated. Thanks. > -- > Peter
Gordon (codergeek42) > GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 /
Fingerprint: > DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1
9479 > My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text
attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type:
application/pgp-signature > Size: 251 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital
signature > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060922/2c70902c/signature.bin > > ------------------------------ > >
Message: 14 > Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:40:47 +0200 > From: Mark
Rosenstand <mark@borkware.net> > Subject:
Re: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? > To: Development discussions related to
Fedora Core > <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <1158990047.833.50.camel@mjollnir.borkware.net> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2006-09-22
at 21:10 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: >> Hello, all. >>
>> I've not as of yet been able to get Compiz and AIGLX eye-candy
working (odd >> since it was working nicely around the FC6T2 time
frame). Because of this, AIGLX >> doesn't seem very useful to me, and
as I've been having some issues with a few >> SDL/OpenGL apps, I'd like
to disable it to test if it is AIGLX or something else >> that is
malfunctioning. >> >> I looked through the radeon(4) and
xorg.conf(5) man pages with Yelp and found >> nothing useful. A google
search returned an earlier post from the X.org mailing >> list from
Donnie Berkholz suggesting to add `Option "AIGLX" "off"` in the >>
ServerFlags section of the xorg.conf file. Unfortunately, that just results
in >> a hardlock when between when RHGB finishes and when GDM attempts
to start up. >> >> Any suggestions would be most appreciated.
Thanks. > > I don't think you need to disable it in the server -
just either disable > the compositor in metacity, or in the case of
compiz, don't launch it. > > > >
------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Sat,
23 Sep 2006 11:18:27 +0300 > From: Gilboa Davara <gilboad@gmail.com> > Subject:
Re: ctrl-c during boot != good > To: Development discussions related to
Fedora Core > <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <1158999507.19122.29.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri,
2006-09-22 at 13:49 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Dax Kelson
(dax@gurulabs.com) said: >>
> SysVinit-2.86-12 >> > ---------------- >> > * Thu
Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com> -
2.86-12 >> > - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be
passed to hung >> > services (#184340) >> >
>> > I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be
interpreting >> > this wrong. >> > >> > You
do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up. >> >
Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or
commands >> > (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious
security breach. This >> > is also a disaster for a kiosk where
random malicious joe blows can >> > screwup and stop the
boot. >> > >> > I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the
"can press control-c during >> > bootup" problem. Lets not go
backwards. >> >> We have multiple requests from people who
want to be able to press >> ctrl-c to stop hanging daemons. Note that
you can *already* interrupt >> rc.sysinit. >> >>
Bill >> > > I second Dax's comment. > Can you make
it configurable? > > Gilboa > > > >
------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Sat,
23 Sep 2006 03:42:25 -0500 > From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com> >
Subject: Core x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 > To:
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <20060923034225.A30049@humbolt.us.dell.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >
Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Fri Sep 22 22:20:06 CDT
2006 > > Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build
chroot > starting with FC6test2. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more > information, including the list of packages
removed from the default > build chroot. > > Note: You will
need to rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras for FC6 > starting August
28, 2006. See here for more details: > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html > > > Total packages: 1156 > Number
failed to build: 46 > Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or
ExcludeArch: 25 > Leaving: 21 > (there may be some duplicates
if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) > > Of those expected to
have worked... > Without a bug filed: 21 >
---------------------------------- > alacarte-0.10.0-1.fc6 >
am-utils-6.1.5-4 > compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-61 > compat-gcc-34-3.4.6-4
> control-center-2.16.0-5.fc6 > file-roller-2.16.0-2.fc6 >
gdb-6.5-8.fc6 > gnome-media-2.16.1-2.fc6 > grub-0.97-12 >
gthumb-2.7.8-3.fc6 > jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-5jpp.1 >
jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-3jpp.1 > kdesdk-3.5.4-2.fc6 >
memtest86+-1.65-4.1 > nautilus-2.16.0-4.fc6 >
rhythmbox-0.9.5-4.fc6 > syslinux-3.11-4 > totem-2.16.1-1.fc6
> valgrind-3.2.0-5 > xen-3.0.2-36 > yelp-2.16.0-3.fc6
> > With bugs filed: 0 >
---------------------------------- > > > Full logs at
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ > > -- > Matt Domsch > Software
Architect > Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux > Linux on
Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com >
> > > ------------------------------ > >
Message: 17 > Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:42:34 -0500 > From: Matt
Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com> >
Subject: Core i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 > To:
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com >
Message-ID: <20060923034234.A30067@humbolt.us.dell.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >
Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Fri Sep 22 22:22:23 CDT 2006 >
> Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build
chroot > starting with FC6test2. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more > information, including the list of packages
removed from the default > build chroot. > > Note: You will
need to rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras for FC6 > starting August
28, 2006. See here for more details: > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html > > > Total packages: 1157 > Number
failed to build: 15 > Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or
ExcludeArch: 10 > Leaving: 5 > (there may be some duplicates
if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) > > Of those expected to
have worked... > Without a bug filed: 5 >
---------------------------------- > beagle-0.2.10-2.fc6 >
jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-5jpp.1 > jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-3jpp.1
> kdesdk-3.5.4-2.fc6 > xorg-x11-drv-via-0.2.1-5 > >
With bugs filed: 0 > ---------------------------------- > >
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ > > -- > Matt Domsch > Software
Architect > Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux > Linux on
Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com >
> > > ------------------------------ > >
-- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > End of fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue
51 >
*************************************************