On 12/01/2010 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Because it's not so almighty. In BSD-land, including Solaris, the devices
are named after the driver, so you get /dev/sis0 and /dev/bge1 and
/dev/e1000g0 and whatnot.
That BSD scheme suffers the same pitfalls as the current fedora scheme
- change hardware and if its not same driver your firewall breaks.
I like the biosdevname approach better - at least if I understand it
correctly.
gene