Am 18.09.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Scott Schmit:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:09:47PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 14.09.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Adam Williamson:
>> But just two posts ago you were drawing a distinction between an 'OS'
>> and a 'distribution' and saying that Fedora ought to be a distribution
>> not an OS.
>>
>> So basically you're saying...Fedora should be a distribution but it
>> shouldn't include 'userdata', and you're somehow defining
Wordpress as
>> 'userdata', on the basis that it's often deployed for multiple
users.
>
> surely - you can't deploy an application (no matter what language) supposed
> to run hundrets of times with different configs, customazations and themes
> with a central package managment
>
> *anything* which is not supposed to be used that way is a completly
> different story
But we do! All these:
- GNOME
- KDE
- Firefox
- Chrome/Chromium
- pidgin
- vim
- emacs
support different:
- configurations
- customizations
- themes
with central package management
you really compare them with wordpress or any other web-application
which are supposed to have their configgs editable by the webspace owner?