On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 10:34 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 09:05:02AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Would we be keeping these separate for a long time? Alternatives
> > are
> > really pretty ugly and I'd hate to see that introduced just for
> > one
> > release.
>
> After handling all the rebuilds for version 7, it is pretty rare
> for
> an upstream to support version 7 right now. I would strike an
> uneducated guess at 1-2 years for upstreams to come around to
> porting. It would not surprise me if some upstreams stay at version
> 6 unless ImageMagick decides to stop supporting version 6. Not to
Ugh. How many of these are using the library and how many are
shelling
out? Could we just tack a 6 on the end of all of the older binaries?
I think is more simpler use version 7 just in F28 and we gain some
time.
I (also) saw that API change is not easy to fix [1] , issue opened in
Jul 18, and no one provide a patch ...
[1]
https://github.com/OpenShot/libopenshot/issues/60
> mention the dead upstreams where we will have to port ourselves
or
> our friends at Canonical and Debian that don't even have version 7
> (or a recent version 6) in their repos.
Or port those to GraphicsMagick as suggested elsewhere.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Sérgio M. B.