On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Phil Knirsch <pknirsch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 10/28/2013 03:36 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
>
> On 10/28/2013 01:20 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone.
>>
>> As FESCO appointed me last Wednesday as the coordinator for the Fedora
>> Base Design WG i wanted to start reaching out as soon as possible.
>>
>> The first task of a coordinator is to select and present the initial
>> voting committee for the WG, chosen from the volunteers on
>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora.next/WG_Nominations and add that
>> to the corresponding fedora ticket
>>
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1170
>>
>> My approach and criteria for the selection was as follows:
>>
>> a) Include as many community members as possible as their
>> representation in the volunteer list was already rather low and we
>> really wanted to get at least 50% community members in there.
>>
>
> Afaik you chose none.
>
See my comments about Jon Disnard later in my text, i assumed he was still a
community member only to hear about him being a RH employee for less than a
month now on Friday evening.
>> Unfortunately the only person from QE was Jóhann B. Guðmundsson, but
>> he is already a committee member in the Server WG. Same goes for
>> infrastructure where Kevin Fenzi is as well in the Server WG already.
>>
>
>
> There is no rule to that says nominators cant serve on more the one
> group, infact there exist quite bit of overlap already so both of us
> could have been choisen...
>
Looking at
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1170 i see no overlap
between all 4 WGs so far, but maybe i'm missing something.
I'm coordinator for the Workstation WG, and also up for the Base WG.
I did this willingly.
josh