Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> said:
1. Why shouldn't the burden of proof be on the side which wants
the status quo?
You seem to be ignoring the fact that there are multiple status quos in
Fedora. There is "more stable" (GNOME, Firefox for example) vs. "more
rolling" (KDE). I personally think it would be better to have a single
(published) status quo across the distribution, so users know what to
expect, no matter which desktop, browser, office suite, etc. they
2. These users are our niche, the others are better served by other
distributions. Numbers shouldn't matter. I think blindly charging for
popularity is going to kill us.
If numbers shouldn't matter, and charging for popularity is bad, why do
we need to target your "semi-rolling update" mode?
Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.