On 01/04/2009 01:16 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Perhaps this would be a good compromise -- using randomization to
> eliminate bias that favors quantity of simpler reviews.
But it also eliminates the incentive to continue doing reviews in that year
once you hit the magical threshold 'N'.
Come on, Kevin, if someone does reviews just for the
should not be
here in the first place. We do it for the community, not for a personal
pride. You've reached the threshold ? Fine. The community thanks you.
Now, go on.