On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Matej Cepl <mcepl@redhat.com> wrote:
On 2013-02-04, 19:52 GMT, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> It's an outdated article and not much relevant to the current
> discussion (you see, it says "the Symphony repository"...).
> [...]
> The Symphony code is like everything else in this respect: all
> Symphony code that OpenOffice will choose to use will sooner or later
> go to trunk and into a release, receiving the same paranoid attention
> as the rest and a crystal clear license notice (the Apache 2 License
> in this case) allowing anybody to use it.

And then (and only then) there will be something released from IBM to
the public. Until then my comment https://lwn.net/Articles/533402/
stands and the discussion on that webpage is still pretty relevant.



At the same time, it's still totally irrelevant for the purpose of this discussion.