On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 16:24:49 +0200,
Miloslav Trmač <mitr(a)volny.cz> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Brendan Conoboy
<blc(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Please consider the idea that there is a useful middle ground "Primary"
and
> "Secondary".
With the FESCo-member-as-elected-by-contributors hat on, there really
isn't a middle: The individual packagers are either responsible for
making their package work on ARM or not.
Being responsible for, doesn't have to mean having do all of the work for.