On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:00 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
In other words, by only failing a build when a primary arch fails,
we
enable the inclusion of many other architectures for those who care
about them, without imposing additional burdens on all maintainers
(who may not care about them).
Otherwise, why bother making a distinction at all?
Precisely.
Now, when a build fails on a secondary arch, it won't be silent. Emails
will go out to the architecture team, as well as a daily summary to
fedora-devel-list on a per-arch basis (e.g. I built these packages
sucessfully, I tried to build these, but they failed).
~spot