On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:48:14PM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 12:20 +0200, Henrik Wejdmark wrote:
> > > Since you recommend not using the application menu, in other words,
> > > you agree that the application menu is useless?
> > >
> >
> > It is useful when you are looking for something and you don't know what
> > exactly it is. In that case, it is much much better then the previous
> menus,
> > because you have nice overview on one page and moreover you have the
> > possibility to filter by groups for example.
>
> On my desktop it's not on "one" page, it's a mile long listing so
you get no
> overview at all. In Gnome2 at least all the apps are categorized. If the
> graphical user interface _requires_ you to use the keyboard to type the
> command
It doesn't require you to type the command.
You can search for "bro" and among the results will be Nautilus and
Firefox (hint: Gnome Shell also searches in the application description,
and both are "bro"wsers).
I can't believe real usability testing was done on the final version
of GNOME 3. I keep hearing about all these completely undiscoverable
keyboard shortcuts that appear to be necessary to use GNOME 3 with any
sort of effectiveness. When I struggled with GNOME 3 for about a week
I didn't discover or use any keyboard shortcuts.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw