the distribution doesn't seem unreasonable/out of the ordinary in any sense.
The first part where he prefers that it not be packaged at all is out of the
odinary but from the conciliatory tone of the rest, perhaps its literally
just him talking about his idea of an ideal world.

You may package this.  You may want to let upstream know that you have and
that he can feel free to direct people using the Fedora packages to our
bugzilla/IRC channels. 

Naming wise... applications do not have to use python-* but a lot of python
applications (lamson seems to be in this boat) contain python modules and
those really should be named python-*.  Especially nowadays when we build
python3 versions of a lot of modules.  From the sound of the review request
("I consider Lamson analogous to frameworks[...]") this should probably be
named python-lamson.

-Toshio

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Thanks Toshio
I will mail to upstream about lamson package.

Thanks and Regards,
Praveen Kumar
http://fedoraproject.org/
http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com