On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 22:58 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 12 septembre 2007 à 21:42 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit
:
> Le mercredi 12 septembre 2007 à 08:17 -0800, Jeff Spaleta a écrit :
> > On 9/12/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Or, if you need another level of indirection, include a repo that
> > > doesn't itself have anything controversial but has a package that
> > > configures yum for repos that might.
> >
> > oh classy. So how would that work from a user perspective?
>
> I hope yum has a check somewhere to forbid installation of unknown
> default-on repositories.
There is a difference between trusting a repo and trusting it to
authorize other repos
trusting the repo to have packagers who won't do that stuff.
-sv