On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:29:59PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 04/23/2012 07:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>We shouldn't be promoting anything to primary arch that you can't install.
Valid point but it still does not explain why FESCo chose to limit
that exclusively to Anaconda and the "Installer team" and their
installation methods or lack there of.
ARM is moving into the server and laptop space. There's an expectation
that devices of that nature can be installed using Anaconda. If a port
is only supporting embedded devices where Anaconda makes no sense then
that's fine, but if it's supporting other hardware classes then it needs
to have a working Anaconda. I've no idea why this is controversial.
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org