2010/6/30 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com>:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:04:51 +0800, Chen wrote:
> 2010/6/30 Rich Mattes <richmattes(a)gmail.com>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
> > Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
> > obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in libjpeg-turbo-devel instead.
> > Unfortunately, when it pulls in dependencies for my other BuildRequires,
> > it's trying to pull in libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo, and I get a conflict
> > since they both provide libjpeg.so.62.0.0
> >
> > The only thing I can think of is that one of the packages I'm requiring
> > has an explicit dep on libjpeg (I'm about to investigate which). For
> > the time being, is there any to work around this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rich
> >
> > [1]:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2282066
> >
> > --
>
> See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607554
Why doesn't libjpeg-turbo contain the proper Obsoletes for libjpeg?
Only libjpeg-turbo-devel does it correctly for libjpeg-devel and
libjpeg-static.
That's only half of the show. libjpeg-turbo is meant to replace libjpeg,
so it should obsolete it. And if it also added the "Provides", there
would be no need to rebuild dependencies, but considering that this is
Rawhide, okay if it doesn't add the "Provides".
--
libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes
libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils. I don't know why
Rich's package failed to build on koji, the problem is a bit weird.
Among 5 packages which require libjpeg explicitly, only
java-1.6.0-openjdk will be used as a BR, however Rich's packages is
irrelevant to java. FYI, provides libjpeg is also add to
libjpeg-turbo-utils now, I don't know if it can solve the file
conflicts.
Chen Lei