On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 11:41 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 01:17:15AM +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> There are a bunch of packages blocking F-GUIDELINES on the ground of being Java
> packages and the Java guidelines not being finalized. Yet there are another
> bunch of Java packages which have been in Fedora for years. This is
> inconsistent and just generally doesn't make sense. If what we have now is good
> enough for all the existing packages, why wouldn't it be for new ones? And once
> the guidelines are finalized, the packages can always be fixed to conform to
> them.
I understand your reasoning, I have pleaded the same on the packaging list, but
without results. So now I've volunteered to pick up working on the java
guidelines and beating them into shape. Unfortunately I haven't found any time
for this sofar.
Can you give a pointer to (or explain) what the outstanding issues with
the current draft guidelines are?