On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 01:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/21/2017 01:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +0000
> "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb(a)znmeb.net> wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> >
> > Rawhide as it currently exists can't stay solid enough for me even
> > with just the few pieces I absolutely need. Tumbleweed, for all it's
> > promise of "latest and greatest", is not supported by enough third
> > parties to be useful even as just a host. And sid is, well, sid.
>
> I'm curious what issues you hit with Rawhide? Have any examples?
Current rawhide (== Feb 15) does not match with what the builders use.
=> It's impossible to locally investigate runtime bugs
[adamw@adam productmd (parse-cid)]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/koji.repo
[koji]
name=koji
baseurl=http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/x86_64/
cost=2000
enabled=1
Please don't do this as a matter of course, because kojipkgs only has
so much capacity. But when composes are failing, you can do this to get
the latest packages.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net