On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 07:00 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote:
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>
> > Thank you Michael , btw about package naming IMHO webkitgtk4
> should be
> > called webkit2gtk3 and for gtk4 webkit2gtk4
> The webkitgtk4-devel package already provides pkgconfig(webkit2gtk-
> The GNOME system for naming pkg-config files is
> <name>-<major-ver-series>, so it's clearer with the pkgconfig name
> than the package name.
> The naming of the packages was especially dumb in Fedora. It might
> make sense to add some Provides that add sensible names, too.
The right name from upstream's POV (I talked to them when adding the
package to Fedora - and I was considering webkit2gtk3 as well) is
webkitgtk4 as the 4 on the ends means API version and it's not
connected to GTK+ version.
But during the last Web Engines Hackfest Michael was keen on renaming
the package to webkit2gtk3 (so we are ready for GTK+ 4 based WebKit).
BTW , I checked debian package and they build webkit2gtk3 and
webkit2gtk2  and also his naming looks better ;) (webkit2gtk-4.0)
.So I would suggest webkit2gtk3-4.0 , webkit2gtk2-4.0 and webkit2gtk4-
Sérgio M. B.