I do not see anything in the f17 feature page describing any graphical configuration tool. But I also agree that gui configuratio is needed, otherwise it will probably be really difficult to do things like connect via ssh or share via rygel or other dlna server.

On Apr 17, 2012 6:32 PM, "Adam Williamson" <awilliam@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 15:43 +0200, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 07:13 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:21 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> >>>
> >> firewalld-config is not finished, yet. I am working on it.
> >
> > This is still not in F17 beta RC4 which means it's not going to be in the beta at all. I'm a little mystified why firewalld would ship as the default firewall without the *primary* configuration tool being available for testing.
> >
> > firewall-cmd is irritating to use. man firewall-cmd and firewall-cmd -h return two different results. My SOP at the moment is having systemd stop and disable firewalld in order to actually get work done.
> >
> firewall-config is the graphical config tool. firewall-cmd is the
> command line config tool. The man page for firewall-cmd is outdated.
> There will be an update package this week with new and also updated man
> pages.

The point is that firewall-config still doesn't appear to exist. It is
not present at all in firewalld-0.2.4-1.fc17.noarch.rpm . I agree with
Chris and others on test@ who are concerned that post-Beta is rather
late for the graphical configuration tool to show up, if it's going to
show at all. Was FESCo aware of this when voting on the acceptance of
firewalld as a late feature?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel