Am 12.04.2014 17:21, schrieb Paul Wouters:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
That's wrong. a DNS server can use a forwareder for some or all of its recursive queries. unbound+dnssec-triggerd mostly cause unbound to do full recursion but using the ISP nameserver as forward for all queries.
oh no - please try to understand what recursion means in case of DNS
may i suggest to read some docs because if i talk about DNS as one who maintains 600 domains as DNS provider as well as Registry for the .at domain and implemented DNS admin-backends years ago i know what i am talking about
If we are going to do appeals to authority for making arguments, I've been doing DNSSEC since 2001, ran an ISP between 1995 and 2005 that had 500+ domains, have pending DNS RFC drafts out there, am acknowledged on many more DNS RFCs published, am a member of a global DNS incident response team, member of DNS-OARC, implemented a failover dual-software dual-setup multi-local DNSSEC signed for a TLD larger that .at praised by the entire DNS industry, performed DNS outage post-mortem at one of Canada's largest banks and was one of ten ICANN newGTLD Registry Services panel members evaluting the 1500 new TLD submissions for their technical implementations of DNS and Registry Services. I think I know what recursion means.....
Now can we go back to actually discussion technical arguments again?
than stop repsond with "That's wrong" if i tell someone forwarding != recursion because you should know it better and use correct terms