On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with
> the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That
> way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME
> (just like they do with other JVMs).
That's right.
In that case, to add another rule - " 8) all alternatives bindings must be
removed" - must be added.
J.