On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:23 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
> would be really nice if we both could coordinate on getting some
> upstream support for this in certain cases. I'm very strongly -1
> against pointless Fedoraisms here.
I'm concerned that if Fedora invents "_sysassets", we're setting
ourselves up to make the upstream advocacy task that you mentioned
I wasn't aware Debian already exported a directory for this. (But
We still need something for CSS frameworks and such, but maybe we
could drop the underscore and have:
/sysassets/ -> for CSS, theming, etc.
The httpd maintainer would really prefer if we didn't use something
Not sure if "Debian does it" is a good enough reason to override
Speaking as a web app package maintainer, I think this policy has
great intentions, and I think there's advantages to following Debian's