01.02.2013 00:17, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Williamson
> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
>> I think that's not the point, one of the two suites will be dominant
>> and you can't provide both of them on a live image for example.
>> LibreOffice was introduced to our live images and we hit target 1GB,
>> do you really think it could be useful having a larger image just
>> because you want to provide both of the office suites?
> The proposal explicitly says that it doesn't envisage including OO on
> any images or in any default install configurations, simply adding it as
> an option in the package repositories.
Which doesn't really need a FESCo approval ... just a package review.
there one sentence which optionally require changes in
LibreOffice too: " The /usr/bin/soffice alias is still a problem since
(in the Fedora packages) it would conflict between LibreOffice and
Apache OpenOffice: it is recommended to fix it in the LibreOffice
packages too, at least using the Alternatives system."
I think it should be approved first if it really required.